W.M.
Keck Center for Cancer Gene Therapy
Developmental
Grants Program Bylaws for Grant Review and Award Process
Purpose
and Function
Process
of Grant Award Selection
Procedure
for Preparing the Application
Notice
of Awards, Committee Decisions, Evaluations
Conditions
Associated with Use of Funds
Eligibility
Administrative
Support
Purpose and
Function
The W.M. Keck
Center for Cancer Gene Therapy Developmental Grants Program provides
a funding mechanism to support new investigators in the field of
gene therapy, innovative research where preliminary data is necessary
to support an extramural funding application, and clinical research
where other funding is not available. Guidelines have been established
for the application and are distributed to all faculty. Grants of
$50,000 for laboratory research and $150,000 for clinical research
may be used over one or two years. At present this program is funded
only by a grant from the Keck Foundation which will expire in 2003.
The total amount available and size of awards are dictated by the
financial state of the Keck Center and is subject to change.
Return
to Top
Process of
Grant Award Selection
All grants
will be initially reviewed by an External Scientific Advisory Board
(ESAB). The members of the ESAB will be selected by the Steering
Committee and will be representative of the many disciplines encompassed
by the field of gene therapy. Grants will be assigned to reviewers
based on their expertise. A minimum of two reviews will be obtained
for each grant. Reviewers will be asked to rank the grants and the
priority scores will be directly based on the rankings. A current
membership list of the ESAB is available from the administrative
office of the Keck Center and will be posted on the Keck Center
web site. The grants will be distributed to member of the ESAB for
review shortly after the annual application deadline of October
1. The Steering Committee will function as a secondary review group.
The Steering Committee will review the priority scores from the
ESAB and determine the percentage of grants to be funded based on
available funds and overall scientific merit. No Steering Committee
member with a potential conflict of interest with a specific grant
will participate in the review of that grant. The Steering Committee
will meet shortly after completion of the reviews by the ESAB. The
specific date, time, and location are included on an agenda sent
to each member at least five working days in advance of the meeting.
Return
to Top
Procedure
for Preparing the Application
In order to
insure a consistent and systematic approach to the application process,
application guidelines have been developed. The procedures described
are to be followed regardless of the amount of financial support
being requested. These guidelines are available in the Keck Center
administrative office, along with assistance in understanding the
policy and procedures of these Committees. An electronic version
of the guidelines may be downloaded from Keck Center site on the
MDACC Internet.
Return
to Top
Notice of
Awards, Committee Decisions, Evaluations
During the
Steering Committee deliberations on grant applications, members
from the same department as the applicant will be absent during
discussions and scoring. All reviews are confidential and anonymous
outside of the committee. Communications concerning reviews are
done through the committee chair. Steering Committee actions which
may be reported include: approved-funded or not funded. ESAB ratings
are available in the Keck Center administrative office. Applicants
not funded are formally advised. Following the Steering Committee’s
decision, successful applicants will be advised by the Keck Center
administrative office of the amount of the award. Fiscal Services
will also be notified of the award and a company/center will be
established. Fiscal Services will advise the researcher of the company/center,
specified restrictions on use of the funds, and source of funds.
Return
to Top
Conditions
Associated with Use of Funds
1.
Restriction
on use of funds:
Funds may be
requested by the investigator for the purchase of supplies, experimental
animals, equipment, computer time, and salary support for research
personnel. All unencumbered funds remaining in a project account
after the award period will be returned to the allotment account
for award to other investigators. If an investigator desires additional
time to use these funds, the investigator must submit a justification
for this extension to the Steering committee which will determine
whether such an extension will be granted.
2. Reporting
Requirements:
Progress
reports describing the research accomplishments, publications,
and presentations, and extramural funding received as a result
of the grant must be submitted to the Keck Center administrative
office annually. Progress reports must be supplied as needed for
other required reports. The Keck Center must be acknowledged in
all publications resulting from research supported by these grants.
Return
to Top
Eligibility
Keck grants
are not renewable. Full-time faculty members at the level of Research
Associate, Instructor, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor,
and Professor are eligible. Previous recipients of a Keck Center
grant are eligible to apply provided the grant is for a novel project
that has not been previously funded by the Keck Foundation. Eligible
faculty may submit only one application per review cycle. Members
of the committee are eligible to apply but may not participate in
the review of their application. Applications from Research
Associates must be accompanied by a letter of support and commitment
from his or her immediate faculty supervisor.
If human subjects or specimens from humans are involved in a clinical
protocol and are not exempt from the regulations, a current (within
12 months) approval from the Surveillance Committee (IRB) will be
required prior to initiation of the protocol and award of funding
specifically for the protocol. Likewise, research involving experimental
animals should have clearance from the Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee (IACUC) prior to funding. The Institutional Biosafety
Committee (IBC) must approve research involving biohazardous material
or recombinant DNA. All regulatory approvals must be obtained from
the Office of Research Administration prior to funding.
Administrative
Support
The Keck Center
administrative office acts as the administrative support arm to
the ESAB and the Steering Committee. In this role, it is responsible
for preparing agendas, attending all meetings, recording recommended
changes to the budget and tabulating voting results by the members.
All of the above, as well as records of applications, notices
to investigators, and reviewers' evaluations are retained on file
in the office.
Return
to Top
|