The
BPI is a brief, simple, and easy to use tool for the assessment of pain
in both clinical and research settings. The BPI uses simple numeric rating
scales from 0 to10 that are easy to understand and easy to translate into
other languages. On the BPI, mild pain is defined as a worst pain score
of 1 - 4, moderate pain is defined as a worst pain score of 5 - 6, and
severe pain is defined as a worst pain score of 7 - 10.
The BPI has been used
extensively around the world to measure the severity and interference
of pain in patients with cancer. It has also been used effectively in
patients with pain from other causes, such as AIDS-related pain and pain
due to sickle cell disease.
How
to Obtain Copies
Detailed Description
Validated
Foreign Language Versions
Current
Validation Studies
Future
Validation Studies
Selected
Publications
Detailed
Description of the BPI
Purpose:
To assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions
Population:
Patients with cancer pain and pain due to other chronic diseases
Assessment
Areas:
Severity of pain, impact of pain on daily function, location of pain,
pain medications, and amount of pain relief in the past 24 hours or
the past week
Responsiveness:
Responds to both behavioral and pharmacological pain interventions
Administration:
Method:
Self-report, interview, or via an Interactive Voice Response System
(IVR)
Time
required: 5 minutes (short form), 10 minutes (long form)
Scoring:
No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic
mean of the 4 severity items can be used as measures of pain severity
and the arithmetic mean of the 7 interference items can be used a
as a measure of pain interference
Reliability:
Cronbach alpha reliability ranges from .77 to .91
Validation:
The BPI has been validated in at least 7 different languages by examining
the consistency of its two factor structure (factors: severity of pain
and impact of pain).
Back to To
Validated
Foreign Language Versions
Chinese
Wang XS, Mendoza TR, Gao SZ, Cleeland CS. The Chinese version of the
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C): Its development and use in a study of
cancer pain, Pain 1996;67:407-416.
Filipino
(formerly Tagalog)
French
Larue F, Colleau SM, Brasseur L, Cleeland CS. Multicentre study of cancer
pain and its treatment in France. British Medical Journal 1995;310:1034-1037.
German
Radbruch L, Loick G, Kiencke P, Lindena G, Sabatowski R, Grond S, Lehmann
K, Cleeland CS. Validation of the German Version of the Brief Pain Inventory.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1999; 18:180-187.
Greek
Hindi
Saxena A, Mendoza T, Cleeland CS. The Assessment of Cancer Pain in North
India: The Validation of the Hindi Brief Pain Inventory, the BPI-H.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1999;17:27-41.
Italian
Caraceni A, Mendoza TR, Mencaglia E, Baratella C, Edwards K, Forjaz
MJ, Martini C,
Serlin RC, de Conno F, Cleeland CS. A validation study of an Italian
version of the Brief Pain Inventory (Breve Questionario per la Valutazione
del Dolore). Pain 1996;65:87-92.
Japanese
Uki J, Mendoza T, Cleeland CS, Nakamura Y, Takeda F. A Brief Cancer
Pain Assessment Tool in Japanese: The Utility of the Japanese Brief
Pain Inventory B BPI-J. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1998;16:364-373.
Spanish
Taiwanese
Vietnamese
Cleeland CS, Ladinsky JL, Serlin RC, Nugyen CT. Multidimensional measurement
of cancer pain: Comparisons of US and Vietnamese patients Journal of
Pain and Symptom Management 1988;3:23-27.
Back to To
Current
Validation Studies
We are currently working
with researchers from other countries in validating these foreign language
versions of the BPI.
Arabic
Cebuano
Dutch
Korean
Portuguese
Russian
Swedish
Back to To
Future
Validation Studies
The BPI has already
been translated in the languages listed below. We would like to collaborate
with investigators from other countries in validating these versions.
We would also like to work with you if you are interested in validating
a language version other than those listed here.
Afrikaans
Finnish
Hmong
Norwegian
Polish
Sepedi
Tswana
Xhosa
Zulu
Back to To
Selected
Publications
Cleeland
CS. Measurement
of pain by subjective report. In: Chapman CR, Loeser JD, editors. Advances
in Pain Research and Therapy, Volume 12: Issues in Pain Measurement. New
York: Raven Press; 1989. p. 391-403.
Cleeland CS, Nakamura Y, Mendoza TR, Edwards KR,
Douglas J, Serlin RC. Dimensions of the impact of cancer pain in
a four country sample: New information from multidimensional scaling.
Pain 1996;67:267-273.
Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, Edwards KR, Cleeland
CS. When is cancer pain mild moderate or severe? Grading pain severity
by its interference with function. Pain 1995;61:277-284.
Back to To
|